Summary: (From John Mertz)
The Sand County Almanac is widely considered to be a classic
among conservation and natural history writings. It is a collection of essays
published in the year after Aldo Leopold’s untimely death in 1948. The essays
are grouped three sections:
(1)
A series of essays based on experiences Leopold
acquired on his worn-out farm in Wisconsin’s sand counties. Leopold had
purchased the farm in 1935 as a weekend retreat.
(2)
The second part, “Sketches from Here and There,”
relates experiences Leopold had acquired elsewhere during his life, mostly
earlier in his life and service as an agent of the U.S. Forestry Service.
(3)
The final set of essays is more philosophical.
Here Leopold tackles the relationships between man and the environment. He
discusses the importance of wilderness and of wildlife. He raises many of the
issues conservationists face today, though in 1948 he could not have foreseen
how badly that relationship has deteriorated.
I read this book at least once a year, mostly in the autumn
when, if I am lucky and keep my ears cocked for their calls, I can see the flocks
of geese flying overhead, traveling from their breeding grounds in the Canadian
Arctic to their wintering grounds in the coastal marshes of Delaware, Maryland,
and points south. To me, their passage marks the true end of summer and the
beginning of Nature’s transition to winter.
Quotes:
"When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."
Quotes:
"When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."
Free edition of the book to read: http://www.umag.cl/facultades/williams/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Leopold-1949-ASandCountyAlmanac-complete.pdf
Author's Foundation Site: https://www.aldoleopold.org/about/aldo-leopold/sand-county-almanac/
Reviews:
Yes Magazine: https://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/power-of-one/book-review-a-sand-county-almanac-by-aldo-leopold
NY Times: https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/13/opinion/a-sand-county-almanac-at-50.html
Silphium -
"This is one little episode in the funeral of the native flora, which in turn is one episode in the funeral of the flora of the world."
Interviews and Articles:
1. With his daughter, Estella: https://www.humansandnature.org/revisiting-sand-county-an-interview-with-estella-leopold
2. NPR: Revisiting Leopold: https://www.npr.org/2013/03/10/173949498/remembering-aldo-leopold-visionary-conservationist-and-writer
3. With Curt Meine: https://longwoodgardens.org/blog/2014-03-03t000000/sand-county-almanac-interview-curt-meine
4. A Millennial Land Ethic: Or What would Leopold do Today? Huff Post, DEc. 6, 2017, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-millennial-land-ethic-o_b_10402060
Films:
1. A Prophet for all Seasons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_29ZlKyJJPo
2. Green Fire: https://www.aldoleopold.org/store/green-fire-dvd/
3. Learning from the Land: https://video.wpt.org/video/wpt-documentaries-aldo-leopold-learning-land/
(news.wisc.edu)
Discussion Questions created by John Mertz - Unfortunately, he can not join us for the discussion.
(1)
Leopold was, by profession, a scientist, one who
asks questions of Nature in order to learn more about how Nature is structured
and how it works. Where in these writings does Leopold exhibit that training?
(2)
Leopold was also a consummate teller of stories,
one who could tell a tale in a way that would really hold your interest. Where
does he show that to best effect?
(3)
Leopold could also be described as a philosopher,
one who thinks deeply about the human condition and of the relationships
between man and his/her surroundings. Where does he display this side of him
most clearly? Is he still entertaining? Are his philosophical musings still
relevant? Did he go far enough in his discussions of the man/environment
dynamic? Given his time, could he have gone further?
(4)
Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why
should he/she read it?
(5)
Leopold is often described as the “Father of
Wildlife Management,” a distinct practical science. What did Leopold see as the
purpose (or purposes) of Wildlife Management? Did he go far enough in his
viewpoint to make this practical science truly sustainable? Do you agree with
his assertion that the value of wilderness experiences diminishes in proportion
to the gadgetry we employ in our pursuit of them? How has our employment of “gadgets”
impacted on the sustainability of wild resources? Why is it that our pursuit of
wild resources always seems to lead to their extinction?
(hcn.org)
